Dan Baldwin Dan Baldwin

Inspired by the 17th century Vanitas movement, Dan Baldwin uses motifs of skulls, birds, flies, flowers and guns in his work, but by intertwining these motifs with elements from politics and culture and presenting these opposing elements in pop candy colours Baldwin both attracts and uneases the viewer.

Dan Baldwin graduated from Maidstone School of Art and has since exhibited in London, Brighton, Newcastle, New York, Paris and Cologne. In 2005 he appeared on BBC2's acclaimed series The Apprentice, alongside artists Rob & Nick Carter and Lucie Bennett. Baldwin has also donated work to two Red Cross charity auctions, where his work sold alongside that of Peter Blake, Billy Childish and Tracey Emin.

Dan Baldwin's work has featured in publications including Dazed & Confused, ID, Elle, Vogue, Living Etc., Modern Painters and The Observer Magazine.

[+/-] more profile..
[+/-] Japanese profile..


INTERVIEW
June 16, 2009 11:39 am

Q. Who are you? Where did you come from and where are you now?
A. I’m Dan Baldwin, born in Manchester, lived in Maidstone, Brighton now living in the West Sussex countryside. .
Q. What’s your recipe for making a piece? How do you find the balance between the two and three dimensional on a canvas?
A. 20 years of practice – I think really, the major factor is that I don’t ever plan a painting, I start with colour, form, mark making, then screenprinting, then more layering, hand painting, 3d, it goes on its own journey until the balance is just right.

Q. What are the similarities and differences between working with canvas and ceramics?

A. Similar approach but totally different medium, ceramic paint is powdery, in my paintings I use emulsion, acrylic, spraypaint – there’s an element of accident with the vases, they go to be fired and are in the hands of someone else – they may break – you also don’t quite know how the colour will come out, -unlike paintings which I am in total control of.

Q. How did you learn what to do and what not to do?

A. Again, 20 years of doing it –I’ve made my own art for this long, it took years to become who I am and create my own language, years of pushing and making art – I’m just beginning really I feel in some ways, it progresses with every painting, experience.

Q. Having such a unique voice, have you ever encountered resistance of any kind in the art world?

A. Well, yes, this was only something I noticed when I really got well known in 2007, suddenly there were all these hardcore street art nuts slating me and I was shocked by this as I trained in fine art /illustration/communication media and had been doing it a long time and had no control over all that –but not much – most people dig it –the ‘fuck religion’ piece got a bit. But hey – you can’t make an omelette without cracking an egg. I’ve always felt that I haven’t been accepted into the ‘real ‘art world, whatever that is, and labeled ‘urban’ which is not me at all but that may be my paranoia and also I’m very cut off from the real world, I live far away from everyone I know and painting is solitary. – I think my work isn’t like many other artists so this happens to put me in that box.

Q. Have you ever had to make any artistic compromises? If so, when? To whom? Why?
A. Yeah, loads, when I was desperate to be a full time artist, of course, id do anything to get money, I was a postman on TV, I was a extra in a cigar commercial, I appeared on the (BBC) show The Apprentice, which was ok as I wasn’t on it much, (they chose me and 4 other artists) and I made about 10 boxing paintings for a sport art company – they were good actually, ALI pieces but it wasn’t something to put my name to – just to earn cash and get out of part time work, and some design work for a greeting card company , anything that brought in the money. It’s what you have to do until you can live of your own work purely. Oh and a commission of a gay guys dog. Say no more about that shall we?
Q. What lessons have you learned career-wise to date?

A. Be yourself f- keep true to my inner voice-progress-try and be a decent person to all the people that buy my work- it pays off. Smile more in photos. Listen more. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket –

Q. Your artwork walks a unique line between the innocuous and the dangerous. Is this intentional? How do you feel this fusion affects viewers’ responses to the themes you address?

A. It is defiantly intentional, but I wouldn’t call it dangerous, I’d say ‘edgy’ I think I’m a devil and an angel in one, I love beauty, but I like to shake it up with some gritty realism – I love the balance between innocence and decay or beauty and death or nature and war – it all links. We live in a ugly beautiful world – I’m also a very angry man, but I’m also really peaceful – my work reflects my state at the time of making it. And the world – it’s organic. People are drawn in by the candy colours but then the subject matter can be quite sinister. Again, I love that play.

Q. As an outsider, looking into one of your pieces is like stepping into another person’s frame of mind. How do you respond to this? Do you feel your work reflects how you see the world?

A. Yes and no – its an imaginary scene I like to create-you can step into my world yes- I channel things that sometimes I don’t even know where it comes from – it makes sense at the time – I work with feeling -each blob, each element, each colour etc. – someone once said my paintings sum up the world we live in – I liked that – they change so much though from piece to piece – really dramatically, yet are definitely one of mine. I act on instinct, I’m drawn to an image, it may be a sinister photo or a 15th century anatomical study, this will become involved in the narrative. It can be confusing but it’s all really about LIFE.

Q. Symbolism abounds in your work. Can you explain some of your imagery and your re-contextualization of it from piece to piece?

A. Well, I have used the skull for years, it was accidental, the vanitas reference, mortality, decay, life, the flower, nature, innocence, the swallow, freedom and danger (prison), the crucifix, I was brought up catholic but turned my back on it when I was 14 – the knife, I keep using currently, as a child I stole money to buy 5 knifes, I love using them-there are always trademark elements I like to use again – the cobweb -life to the spider, death for the fly – etc. – I throw it all together to create a synopsis for you to work out. I like real elements, I shot my paintings with a real gun, I use real WW2 war medals, real money, Iraqi money, USA money, it’s a real razor that you could use to slit your wrists-I come back to similar symbolism all the time, but it always moves on.

Q. In what ways does the exhibition “Dis-Illusion” reflect your artistic growth and development? How does it connect to previous shows? Have you found a consistent through-line has developed from show to show over the years, or does each exhibition reflect a very precise moment in your personal and creative life?

A. I started this body of work straight after DEAD INNOCENT Sep 08 , which I thought was my best show to date, so yes, it continues from where that ended, there is always a link, but this last 12 months has been quite difficult with the recession and the British economy and my gallery in London went under, so I was affected by all the current climate, which meant I poured it all out into my work, last year was all love and innocence and beauty as I moved to the country after 12 years in a city – (Brighton), so this body of work I think is some of my best work, very directly affected by the climate – but, one piece was started in 2007 – some other works have a Twombly influence as I’d just been to his big retrospective last year as well – I have changed my life a lot in the last 2 years, left behind a chapter and moved away, my work reflects this too – However, I am aware that now I have more time on each show I am layering a lot more so each work is getting very complex, whereas in 2005/6/7 I was working faster and so some of the earlier pieces were simple, Jesus, a flower, a fly, a gun etc –I must remember that some of the best work is the simple stuff too.

Q. What do you think a piece like “Halfway between the Gates of Hell and the Garden of Eden” says about you?

A. I don’t know! That’s not for me to say, I can’t plan a painting like this – or any – I had just been to the Francis Bacon retrospective and was affected by the power of his work – the stage area is a response to his work – the girl is at a halfway point, like she is cowering up against a post – halfway, go this way to hell, with the crazy skeletal fuckers, scarecrow and war general nazi clown fucker, or up to safety! I can’t explain it, it is organic, I just work until I feel it is finished, it is always about getting the balance right on each composition. She is innocent I guess, surrounded by terror and chaos. . .read into it what you like.

Q. If you had one room, one wall, the option to have only one piece on it, what would it be and why?

A. Very hard to answer, if I think of what it was that I first saw as an art student it may be a Peter Blake piece like’ toyshop,’ or a classic Warhol flower or car crash– or a Pollock. Obvious choice is a Basquiat, I was working for ages with text and spontaneity before I ever heard of him, it was 1994, at college when I first discovered his work – I felt sick –always the sign of something good A piece like ‘UNDISCOVERED GENIUS OF THE MISSIPPI DELTA’ from 83-the 5 panels, great colours, great layering– -Rauschenbergs Canyon is a amazing piece, combining taxidermy with paint and screenprint, you see the influence? Or ‘three studies for a crucifixion’ by Francis Bacon – fuck what a painting-the colours – I could look at that for hours – I think it would be a big fuck off Basquiat, I love his collaborations with Warhol, the combinations of Warhols screenprint with Basquiats markmaking, but lets choose the Francis Bacon tryptch, sorry Basquiat – the problem is that I look at how he has done it, and I never see much art that impresses me as I look at how they do it too – The Bacon did impress me – If you meant one of mine well…. ‘Apocalypse wow the end of everything’ I think was a key piece, or the set of ten from ‘Dan Baldwin new paintings Sep 07’ were very strong-the brown Hitler piece was a favourite. – Difficult!

Q. Who will play you in your biopic?
A. Oh god- wow –That would be rather bizarre eh? My girlfriend said someone ‘gay’! I’m not sure what she means by that! Oh someone rugged and sensitive and handsome and determined and a little bit mad– I don’t know -!?
Q. What are some of your plans and dreams of the future?
A. Well, continue to get it out there, aim for perfection which never happens in a painting, it’s the never ending search I guess to find ‘it’ and you never do! – a solo out in NYC would be good – I think because of Warhol, Rauschenberg and Basquiat, and Koons, I’ve shown in NYC but not a solo – at Christmas – yeah that would rock – a sell out solo in NYC at Xmas, that would rock more.. Paris – Tokyo – a nice fat coffee table book one day – just security – to get it worldwide – Be a better painter- practice my craft-continue selling and building my fan base-it is important- international art stardom of course! Not much . .Drive across Europe in my Alfa Spider – That would be nice.







DAN BALDWIN – talks about his painting – 2nd blog entry
February 24, 2008 10:23 am

my work has always had many layers, but recent work i have incorporated
screenprinting with mixed media elements, contrasting alongside the hand
painted elements, creating a rich complex landscape- robert rauschenberg was
the master of this of course , and warhol/basquiats collaborations have
always inspired me .
I enjoy the use of real elements, such as the antique crucifix, or knife,
doller, or razor blade – the photographic quality of the screenprinting, the
ethereal quality of spraypaint, industrial and raw – the hard meets the
soft, life meets death, imaginary meets reality – this contradiction is the
constant source of inspiration for me – i never plan a painting ever, i
start with colour, layering colours until im happy with my base. this then
becomes selected to be printed on or painted on with something i feel like
printing or painting, this may be an image of Adolf Hitler or a tree,a babys
skull or a blackbird,a flower or a fly. . . but whatever it is, it will be
the starting point for the piece, which grows organically until im happy
with the balance. again, these images are things im attracted to, due to
their quality or message – it may be an image of a child who is deaf, or a
haunted house, but i collect images in the same way i collect 3 dimentional
elements – im drawn to them.
the layering is the process, working on each individual element to create a
journey and contradiction of elements in the composition that battle for
attention, but work in harmony together, even though they shouldnt – or
should – so the eye travels across the canvas and makes its own decision
about the story. .
the work is always progressing and developing all the time, due to its
nature it is constantly moving forward as i discover new elements and
techniques and items to incorporate – im attracted to objects like a
collector is, and they are collected until they suit the right canvas.

I think the fact that a canvas is spontaneous and organic is what gives the
work the energy – i may start a canvas thats red, and it may end up black-
its a journey that each piece takes on. . i think this gives the work a real
energy – sometimes i work on many canvasses at once, often starting, leaving
for weeks until it feels right to continue that piece – I discovered the
work of New York artist Joseph cornell back in 1990 and he inspired me with
the way he worked, he collecteditems from all over new york and would put
them in a file, then when he found another item that worked well with the
first item/object, he would put it with that until he had enough in the file
for a piece – so in his studio he had a whole wall of boxes, each was a file
containing items and objects that went well with the other, and then when
full a 3d beautiful box was created for the objects to be displayed and
arranged in – he would let the children in the neighborhood play with these
boxes, which are now worth millions
As well as him, peter blake the pop artist was a huge inspiration to me,
again, another huge collector of objects and items.
I do the same, i buy things im attracted to for the work, even though i dont
know when i will use it- sometimes it will sit in my studio for years until
the right time for it to be used, like a boxing glove or a photo of a
soldier in ww2.
my next show is in september 2008 in Forster gallery london -














DAN BALDWIN – talks about his painting – 1st blog entry
August 30, 2007 1:42 pm


THE PAINTING I CURRENTLY HAVE HANGING IN OPUS GALLERY NEWCASTLE IS CALLED ‘AN EXPLOSION OF LIFE N DEATH’
IT IS NINE FEET WIDE AND 3.5 FEET HIGH..
IT IS IN THREE PANELS AND FEATURES 3D ELEMENTS ALONGSIDE HAND PAINTED ELEMENTS. .
I HAVE USED MANY TRADEMARK SYMBOLS IN THIS PIECE, MY WORK IS ALL ABOUT DOUBLE MEANINGS AND CONFLICTING CONTRADICTIONS. . .LIFE MEETS DEATH, INNOCENCE MEETS CYNICISM, POLITICS MEETS RELIGION, WAR MEETS DECAY, HOPE MEETS DESTRUCTION ETC. . .
WE SEE THE CROWN OF THORNS, THE CROWN THAT WAS PLACED ON THE HEAD OF CHRIST ALONGSIDE A PLASTIC HOTDOG, WE SEE A BANANA NEXT TO A HUMAN BONE, WE SEE A TARGET ALONGSIDE AN ANIMAL SKULL, A TOMATO FLOATING OVER A RIBCAGE,WE SEE COBWEBS WITH PLASTIC FOOD,US DOLLERS AND REAL KNIVES. .
ALWAYS MY WORK IS ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ELEMENTS . .
A SPIDER WEB IS FOOD FOR A SPIDER BUT DEATH FOR A FLY. .
WE SEE ANTIQUE CRUCIFIXES AND A BULLET. .
THE VIEWER GOES ON A JOURNEY ACROSS THE CANVAS, READING THE SYMBOLS AND THEIR MEANINGS AND AN ARGUMENT IS OPENED UP, WHY IS THIS HERE, WHAT DOES IT MEAN NEXT TO THIS ETC.
I LIKE TO ALLOW THE VIEWER TO LET THEIR OWN ENTERPRETATIONS COME INTO THE PIECE, I WONT SAY WHY I PLACE AN ELEMENT NEXT TO ANOTHER, BUT I WORK ON INSTINCT.
EVERY PIECE OF COLOUR IS ON PURPOSE, THERE IS NO ACCIDENT.ITS ALL ABOUT BALANCE.
I START A PIECE WITH COLOUR, USING INDUSTRIAL HOUSEHOLD PAINTS AND SPRAYPAINTS TO BUILD UP A BASE, USING EMOTION AND FEELING, UNTIL IT FEELS RIGHT.
I THEN START WITH AN ELEMENT, WHICH MAY BE A IRAQI DINA (CURRENCY 0 OR A CRUCIFIX, A SKULL OR A KITCHEN KNIFE, THEN THE JOURNEY BEGINS AND THE PAINTING STARTS.
I HAVE PERSONAL LINKS WITH THE ELEMENTS, LIKE ST GUADALOUPS IS A VERY MEXICAN ICON, AND I WAS IN MEXICO EARLIER IN THE YEAR, BUT IT ALSO WILL REFER TO RELIGION AND CATHOLISM, I WAS ALSO BORN A CATHOLIC. . .BUT IM NOT RELIGIOUS AT ALL.
THE POPPY IS ANOTHER TRADEMARK ELEMENT I USE, ITS LIFE, BUT ALSO SYMBOLIC OF DEATH, THE POPPIES THAT GROW IN A FIELD AFTER A BATTLE ETC, THE BRITISH HAVE A DAY EVERY YEAR CALLED POPPY DAY, TO COMMEMORATE THE SOLDIERS WHO FOUGHT IN WW1. .
A TOMATO IS INNOCENT, LIFE, FOOD, NATURE ETC, BUT IT WILL DECAY ALSO, LIKE THE RIBCAGE, DEATH IS OMNIPRESENT.
THERE IS A PHOTO OF A WOMAN, A GIRL, WHO WAS SHE? IS SHE ALIVE? IS SHE DEAD?
ITS SINISTER.
I LIKE USING CANDY HAPPY POP COLOURS TO ATTRACT THE VIEWER BUT I LIKE TO LEAVE THEM ALSO FEELING ON EDGE, ITS A FINE BALANCE BETWEEN THE BEAUTIFUL AND THE SINISTER.








LINK
TRANSLATE
  • Auto Translate
    This function will not provide you with a perfect translation.

ARCHIVES
FEED